SNOWWING POLITICS

Posts Tagged ‘Barack Obama’

Gingrich rebounds in South Carolina, receives Rep. J.C. Watts’ endorsement

In ELECTION 2012 on January 16, 2012 at 10:27 am
Image

Former Oklahoma Republican Congressman J.C. Watts endorses Newt Gingrich in front of large crowd at the Rally for Home Ownership in front of the South Carolina Statehouse. (01-12-2012)

Despite bad press pertaining to his waffling over the intensity of his attacks toward GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney – and lukewarm receptions in the Iowa Caucus and New Hampshire Primary –former House Speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich arrived in South Carolina with characteristic bravado and energy.

In grand cinematic style, Gingrich and members of his staff, descended the steps from the doors of the South Carolina Statehouse last Thursday, to greet a cheering crowd after a rousing endorsement from former Oklahoma Republican Congressman J.C. Watts.

Gingrich’s address departed from the usual stump speeches expected during such a tight campaign schedule. At the rally, co-hosted by the National Association of Home Builders, entitled “Rally for Home Ownership”, Gingrich reflected on the value of owning a home and his proposals to re-energize the struggling housing market. Read the rest of this entry »

Advertisements

A New Battlefield

In Uncategorized on April 14, 2011 at 7:29 am

http://realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/04/13/charles_krauthammer_on_obamas_speech_it_was_a_disgrace.html

Krauthammer eloquently states how Barack Obama’s speech no longer reflects someone who called for consensus and a new era of politics. Obama has re-staked his claim on liberal ideology that has been surprisingly missing in the past couple of years. Now, Obama is attempting to shore up his base early, knowing that if he continues on his path of moderation there would be too much that his own base could use to cast him as a traitor. I do not know how long this push to the left will last, but I feel that he realizes that if he does not change his rhetoric back to election-like partisanship now, but begins campaigning at the usual time of incumbent presidents, he would be very disadvantaged — since the Republicans have spent his whole presidency winning numerous ideological battles.

But we cannot miss the fact that his move is an act of desperation. Therefore, whether a person against Obama is in favor of Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget or not, cannot disagree that Ryan’s budget has completely reconfigured the budgetary playing field in the Republicans’ favor. The extreme demands of the House budget proposal forced the Democrats to propose a budget that also contains massive cuts. The compromise forces the Democrats into concessions that previously would be unheard of. Although the cuts are not to the same extent, the general trend of both parties shows voters that the need to cut the budget is a generally accepted fact. Because of this, I’m willing to predict that even the most extreme Republican side will be seen as favorable by voters, without knowing what the cuts are going to be.

I am still certain that Barack Obama will win re-election, since the GOP will probably not find an electable opponent as internal ideological rifts become more prominent, I suspect Obama’s second term will be revolutionary in how conservative his actions will be. Not having to worry about re-election, Obama will try to avoid fights with congress and disagreeing with the people so as not to go down in history with a low presidential approval rating.

I believe, Paul Ryan and his House Budget proposal incredibly moved the entire ideological midpoint far to the right.

Alan Gross imprisonment reveals Obama’s foreign policy ineptitude

In Uncategorized on April 6, 2011 at 4:54 am

By: Dmitriy Shapiro | April 05, 2011

Distracted as we are by the unprecedented domino-like toppling of a multitude of the Middle East’s oppressive regimes and dictatorships – and President Barack Obama’s waffling on issues arising from our George W. Bush era interventions (should we try terrorists at home or not?), we’ve left our small Communist neighbor, the Republic of Cuba, under much less scrutiny than usual.

Raul and Fidel Castro have rightfully seen this as a window of opportunity to deal a blow to the United States – much like their “Axis of Evil” mentors Iran under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and North Korea under Kim Jong Il – by capturing an American civilian contractor and throwing him in jail without any guarantee of imprisonment length or trial date.

Maybe this is the first time you’re hearing of this – don’t be ashamed if you are, this story has not grabbed the public’s attention quite like the American nationals that were captured in other, more loudmouthed nations. Maybe that this captive, 61-year-old contractor Alan Gross, is neither young nor related to a celebrity. Gross, captured in December 2009 – apparently a good year for capturing Americans – has been wasting away in a high-security Cuban jail ever since, with little media or international scrutiny. Only recently, miniscule pressure from the U.S. forced the Cuban government to finally try and sentence Gross – 15 months after his detention.

The verdict delivered by the Cuban court on March 12 sentenced Gross to 15 years in jail for attempting to implement a “‘subversive’ program paid for by the United States that aimed to bring down Cuba’s communist government.”

Allegedly, Gross, a contractor for a U.S. Agency for International Development backed networking firm Development Alternatives, Inc, based in Bethesda, Md., whose mission statement is “to make a lasting difference in the world by helping developing nations become more prosperous, fairer and more just, cleaner, safer, healthier, more stable, more efficient, and better governed.”

It is not hard to see why working for this firm could arouse suspicion in anti-democratic nations throughout the world, but what actual threat could the Cuban government have received from Gross’ work to warrant such a prolonged internment and a 15-year sentence – pretty much a life sentence for a man of his age and health. Gross, a Jewish-American, was working to enable a small Cuban Jewish community access to the internet in order to communicate with other communities within Cuba as well as around the world. His work included the distribution of laptops, satellite phones and other hard/software to this tiny, peaceful and aging community – hardly a subversive revolutionary force.

Having recently awakened to the call of humanitarianism, the Obama administration has recently granted Gross’ case a small portion of their attention and sent bumbling foreign affairs flunkey, Hamas-apologist and diplomatic third-stringer ex-President Jimmy Carter to meet with Raul and Fidel Castro to secure Gross’s release. After publicly embarrassing and subverting U.S. foreign relations on the Cuban media circuit – appearing on television and radio shows to blast the U.S.’s Cuban embargo and calling for the U.S. to release five Cuban spies that are being held for delivering information to our Middle Eastern enemies – Carter hobnobbed with the Castros like the old friend he is. According to an APF report, Cuban dissident blogger Yoani Sanchez wrote, “Because he has the experience that managed the release (in 2010) of an American in North Korea, maybe he can do the same here, but the Cuban government is harder.”

Really? “Harder” than North Korea? Jimmy Carter did successfully free English teacher Aijalon Gomes, a Boston native, after Gomes had crossed over the North Korean border. Yet for what the U.S. deemed a priority – the release of journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee that same year, the administration sent the significantly more prestigious former President Bill Clinton.

Not surprisingly, Carter left Cuba on March 30 without securing Gross’s release, stating that he wasn’t expecting that outcome.

Cuban President Raul Castro and his venerated brother Fidel have made a mockery of American foreign policy. They, along with the world’s other dictators, are seeing the Obama administration’s foreign policy as a joke – as was predicted by Republicans before and after the president’s election. The liberties taken by the nations that President Bush called the “Axis of Evil,” had not disappeared as expected by Obama’s supporters, but only increased, a trend demonstrated by the rise in the kidnappings of American nationals by non-terrorist states for diplomatic leverage. Meanwhile, our actions in Libya, highlight that finally, humanitarian considerations are now factoring in this administration’s logic, although quite arguably, the wrong kind of logic.

But Gross’s crime of providing internet access to a small and marginalized segment of Cuban society – him claiming that he had not realized the hardware he was given was paid for by USAID – invokes another, larger problem.

Many have pointed to how powerful the effects of free communication via the internet empowers the population of a repressed state by observing revolts in Iran, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and others. The story of the previous decade is of government infringement of such freedoms.

No doubt that the restrictions put on media, search engines and general internet use empower repressive regimes to control information to maintain their power. This is not surprising – leaders have always tried to restrict the freedom of information. What’s more appalling is that the post-President Bush U.S. has not challenged any of these present incursions when such power is being used by nations to avoid the fate of their fallen comrades. In a recent opinion column, Washington Post columnist and Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer slammed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for a statement describing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, sounding more like Hugo Chavez than an American dignitary. “Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer.”

If suppression of free media, restrictions on internet use and violent crackdowns on protesters are Clinton’s idea of reform, then either the Democrats have allied with the Arab Socialist Ba’ath party or the Obama administration thinks Bashar’s actions could teach them to handle their Tea Party opponents. As Krauthammer and others point out, the current administration is displaying a very flawed moral logic.

While President Obama basks in the limelight of the false coalition he built against Qaddafi on shaky moral and constitutional grounds, Gross remains imprisoned and in poor health, wondering whether he will ever see his family again, especially his 88-year-old mother and 26-year-old daughter who are both suffering from cancer. The lack of outrage and sympathy being shown by the administration is vile and contemptible. Alan Gross, his family and supporters can only hope that the media will awake to better expose his case so that the American public can once again strong-arm Obama into action as it did in the previous election.